Can you evaluate where the Open Source Development Lab stands today? Three years ago, the concept behind the lab...
By submitting your email address, you agree to receive emails regarding relevant topic offers from TechTarget and its partners. You can withdraw your consent at any time. Contact TechTarget at 275 Grove Street, Newton, MA.
was to provide data centers with the equipment and resources for people to develop, test and validate code and scale it for enterprise applications and carrier grade applications. I think we've done a great job there. We're highly used by the community and developers.
We've founded working groups that define the road map and processes for implementing carrier-grade Linux and data center. There is a requirement to take Linux to the next level in terms of acceptance level by our members and our board. Where has Linux made enhancements that make it more attractive to enterprises?
I think Linux has made great strides in reliability, availability and scalability areas. We are using the 2.5 version of the Linux kernel in production here. We spend a lot of time talking about RAS and we believe there are some pieces to grow on there. The OSDL has several partnerships with high-profile vendors. Will those partnerships expand?
We would like to see them expand more into the Global 2000. I'd like to see more CIOs, CTOs, people who are decision makers and have an influence in big companies become members of our working groups to drive those requirements needed to adopt Linux. We have a lot of hardware vendors. We need to recruit more ISVs as members and more from the Global 2000. How involved is the lab in the next version of the kernel?
When you think of the top members of the development community, we have them as members of OSDL. We have a solid working relationship with other leading developers who are not members. We are heavily involved working on Linux in our steering committees, technical committees and marketing committees, as well as our working groups. We are doing a lot to drive those requirements with our members in those areas. What are your short-term and long-term goals for the lab?
There have been three goals put forward by our members and our board. One is to accelerate the use of Linux. Two is to attract more members to the lab and provide more value to the industry. Three is to continue the technical work we are doing as it relates to the technical requirements of the working groups.
The overarching goal of our board and members is to see us become the premier advocates for Linux. I think we have the right skills and capabilities among our members to get into that role. What are some of the biggest barriers to Linux enjoying full-blown acceptance in enterprise data centers?
Some of those [barriers] are getting the big ISVs (independent software vendors) on board and lack of support products for Linux. These need improvement. The level of services and support available for enterprise Linux and carrier-grade Linux need to be updated as well. Is Global 2000 representation lacking right now?
It's not lacking. We have a few major hardware vendors in that partnership today. The focus was to get those hardware companies together. Now we want more industry representation as we look at enterprise and carrier grade offerings.
FOR MORE INFORMATION:
FEEDBACK: What would you like to see the Open Source Development Lab do for Linux in the enterprise?
Send your feedback to the SearchEnterpriseLinux.com news team.
Linux has made great strides in reliability, availability and scalability. It has made great strides in application software availability. But there is always more that needs to be done, like in services and support. We are forming an industry advisory council with representatives of the Global 2000 that includes analysts and ISVs that will shape and define the requirements of what we are working on to make the lab successful.