Linux vs. Windows security
In his recent keynote speech at RSA, Bill Gates was quoted as saying that IPv6 and IPsec combined with SmartCard access -- rather than passwords -- are the best ways to protect users' identities and safeguard systems. Does Linux use similar security? If it does, then why does it have fewer security vulnerabilities, holes and flaws. If it doesn't, then what is it that makes Linux so safe?

    Requires Free Membership to View

    When you register, my team of editors will also send you resources covering Linux administration and management; integration and interoperability between Linux, Windows and Unix; securing Linux and mixed-platform environments; and migrating to Linux.

    Cathleen A. Gagne, Senior Editorial Director

    By submitting your registration information to SearchEnterpriseLinux.com you agree to receive email communications from TechTarget and TechTarget partners. We encourage you to read our Privacy Policy which contains important disclosures about how we collect and use your registration and other information. If you reside outside of the United States, by submitting this registration information you consent to having your personal data transferred to and processed in the United States. Your use of SearchEnterpriseLinux.com is governed by our Terms of Use. You may contact us at webmaster@TechTarget.com.

Linux is capable of running IPv6, IPSec and making use of smartcards and similar security controls. These will indeed protect user identity and the integrity of some transactions and system communications. These controls alone, however, do not explain security differences between platforms.

Platform security depends on the:

  • the robustness of the basic operating system
  • the operating system configuration (especially its default state)
  • the applications running on it

Thus far, compared to Windows, Linux has been more secure because its base operating system is robust and secure, most distributions are highly configurable and capable of being hardened (see tools like Bastille Linux) and their default configurations are usually secure.

This was first published in March 2007