How stable is the new Samba package in regards to it acting as primary domain controller (PDC) in a Windows environment?
I know of sites that have been using Samba as a domain controller since Samba-2.0.0 was released. The largest site I know of has 800 Microsoft Windows NT 4 clients. Coming to think of it, they are still running Samba-2.2.2 and have not seen any compelling reason to update. The current stable release is Samba-2.2.7a, with 2.2.8 due out within a few weeks. I suspect that 2.2.8 will likely be the last 2.2.x release.
By submitting your email address, you agree to receive emails regarding relevant topic offers from TechTarget and its partners. You can withdraw your consent at any time. Contact TechTarget at 275 Grove Street, Newton, MA.
Samba-3.0.0 is due out around April this year. It has the ability to use Kerberos and can join a native Active Directory security context. Samba-3.0.0 also provides new migration tools from NT4 style domains to a Samba environment. It has a new multiple back-end ability that means you can mix a Samba tdb based SAM (Security Account Manager) database, with an LDAP back-end, etc.
Samba-2.2.x can act as a "primary' domain controller, as well as as a "fallback" domain controller. I do not like to call it a "back-up" domain controller (BDC) as it functions quite differently from an NT4 BDC.
Samba cannot at this time act as a BDC to an NT4 PDC, or vica versa. The domain control technology has been very stable for at least two years now.
Dig Deeper on Linux administration tools
Have a question for an expert?
Please add a title for your question
Get answers from a TechTarget expert on whatever's puzzling you.