Q

Is SCO guilty of entrapment and harassment?

Two questions:
  • Entrapment. Does the SCO action constitute a form of entrapment? I have downloaded source from their FTP Web site that is a 2.4 kernel which they say is licensible, but free to download. How can they make available what they say is IP and secret?
  • Harassment. Does the SCO press/action constitute a form of harassment? I am a software developer/system designer and I feel harassed.
    a) Entrapment is a concept only in criminal law and does not apply here. The question is whether they are misrepresenting that the use of the download is free. I don't have any of the details so I can't really comment.

    b) I am sorry that you have been so personally affected by all of this; you are not alone, to be sure. I am unaware of any legally recognized claim for harrassment under these circumstances. If SCO knew that you were a developer/designer, that its actions were interfering with your business relationships and that SCO intended to adversely affect those relationships, you might have a claim for intentional interference with economic relations. Such a claim seems like a stretch given what appears in your e-mail.
  • This was last published in September 2003

    Dig Deeper on Linux news and updates

    Have a question for an expert?

    Please add a title for your question

    Get answers from a TechTarget expert on whatever's puzzling you.

    You will be able to add details on the next page.

    Start the conversation

    Send me notifications when other members comment.

    By submitting you agree to receive email from TechTarget and its partners. If you reside outside of the United States, you consent to having your personal data transferred to and processed in the United States. Privacy

    Please create a username to comment.

    -ADS BY GOOGLE

    SearchDataCenter

    SearchServerVirtualization

    SearchCloudComputing

    SearchEnterpriseDesktop

    Close