How does a journaling filesystem work in the major Linux distros, and what is the difference between Ext2 and Ext3? Ext2 is the standard file system for Linux (I-node based, maintaining metadata, pointing to actual data blocks), while ext3 is a journaled file system. A journaled file system is much easier to recover then a standard one, because you do not need to use fsck anymore for recovery. Data integrity occurs because updates to...
files are written to logs before the actual data blocks are updated. A thread writes data to the f/s and each transaction is flagged. After a crash, updates are copied back from the journal to the filesystem and any incomplete transactions are gone. In case of a failure, a journaled file system will ensure that all inconsistencies are restored back to its prior state.
Prior to journal filesystems, one would need to run fsck to resolve file and metadata inconsistencies. Sure, fsck works, but it is too darn slow and in today's world with partitions getting larger and larger, it just doesn't scale anymore. Filesystem logging, in many ways, is very similar to database logging. We all know that databases keep logs so that if information has not yet been written to data blocks from cache, there is a way to recover. You can think of journaling file systems as providing the same function, but here at the filesystem level.
Related Q&A from Kenneth Milberg
Unix-to-Linux migration expert Ken Milberg describes how virtualization, support, clustering and more fit into the migration of an IT infrastructure ...continue reading
A reader new to Linux wonders about which distribution is recommended for installing Nagios and what Nahant and Tikanga mean.continue reading
Documentation for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 covering checking system performance, tuning, kernel configuration and extending the file system exists ...continue reading
Have a question for an expert?
Please add a title for your question
Get answers from a TechTarget expert on whatever's puzzling you.